Bluenose II trust: Sour end to tangled tale
BACK in 1994, after Halifax lawyer and future Liberal senator Wilfred Moore was named by Liberal premier John Savage to head Bluenose II Preservation Trust, Mr. Moore said the new non-profit would ensure the famed ship’s replica sailed her last days in dignity.
Dignity, however, would surely be the last word applicable to the tortured history of some of the trust’s — and Senator Moore’s (he was appointed to the Upper Chamber by Liberal prime minister Jean Chretien in 1996) — inexplicable actions over the last 18 years.
In 1996, just two years after launching, the trust made waves by going after royalties from everyone who was making products bearing the vessel’s image. At the time, Mr. Moore was quoted as saying the trust had no intention of suing anyone over infringement of its recently acquired copyright of original Bluenose plans.
In 2003, however, the trust filed a lawsuit against a Waverley company, claiming infringement of trademarked images of the Bluenose and Bluenose II — trademarks the provincial government had apparently been unaware had been obtained. The province actually intervened in that case to oppose the trust’s actions.
In 2005, those acrimonious relations clearly played a role in the decision of the Tory provincial government under premier John Hamm to end the trust’s formal responsibility for running Bluenose II. Within months, however, new tensions arose. The trust indicated it planned to continue raising public funds for the vessel, and negotiations stalled over transferring the trust’s assets to the schooner’s new operator, the Lunenburg Marine Museum Society.
A year later, Senator Moore announced he was shutting down the trust and transferring its assets, estimated at up to $1 million, to its successor. That didn’t happen. In 2010, another new deal was announced, this time to transfer the trust’s assets to the new Schooner Bluenose Foundation. A year later, the battle over the trust’s assets was still in limbo.
Earlier this month, seven years after losing its contract to operate Bluenose II, the trust finally transferred about $1.2 million in assets to the province but refused, to the end, to open its books. So the NDP government conceded it has no way of knowing if all money intended for the Bluenose II was recouped.
So much for dignity.
Something Fishy
Submitted by Bill Kelley on July 29, 2012 - 6:49am.
Why not open the books if there's nothing to hide?
"no way of knowing"?!
Submitted by hav2b on July 29, 2012 - 8:50am.
No way of knowing a stove is hot, no way of knowing the sky is blue, no way of knowing if all money intended for the Bluenose II was recouped. I think all these quandaries can be put to rest through even the slightest bit of investigative research. But I guess it's easier for a simpleton to just shrug his shoulders and walk away.
Isn't it great to live in a province where public money means nothing?
Can you say AUDIT !
Submitted by king solomon on July 29, 2012 - 9:15am.
The federal and provincial AG should have a look at this organization.
Ok...so?
Submitted by Here on July 29, 2012 - 10:12am.
The Bluenose II Preservation Trust Society has to file with Revenue Canada every year. The "books" are therefore open to view and audit by Revenue Canada, and everyone can see the returns (cash flow, expenses, donations, compensation, etc). The figures are online for your viewing pleasure.
I have no connection to the "Trust" or the tourist attraction. You want to ask questions then ask why an unneeded lighthouse has to be maintained by the government at Peggy's Cove for the benefit of a few business'. That would achieve more than chasing after mythical figures when there is a federal agency set up to do it anyway.
Moore
Submitted by Tank on July 29, 2012 - 10:41am.
Senator Moore will sleep well tonight, as well as he has slept every night over the past eighteen years he has lived off the public purse. I am of the opinion a public enquiry is in order over this latest political debacle and maybe we the taxpayers will find out why this man is so reluctant to be transparent and up front. If it walks like a duck, quacks like a duck, it’s a duck, but, I smell a rat.
More for Moore?
Submitted by infidel on July 29, 2012 - 12:34pm.
Could it be a case of more for Moore?