MOMBOURQUETTE: Boundary changes could affect female councillors
I had a moment of panic this week when I thought, mistakenly, that the change in electoral boundaries meant that Dawn Sloane, Jennifer Watts and Sue Uteck would all be running against one another in the same district in this fall’s municipal election.
I was relieved to see that Watts plans to run in the new District 8 (Peninsula North) and Uteck in District 7 (Peninsula South), but, just as I was writing this, I learned that Dawn Sloane will unfortunately be facing off against Jennifer Watts.
I say “unfortunately,” because I think it would be a crying shame to lose any of these women’s voices from Halifax regional council. I think the history of backroom dealings during this administration makes it clear that Halifax desperately needs more women’s perspectives in the council chambers, not fewer. And even though I don’t always agree with each of these councillors on every issue, it’s critical that we keep the active and engaged women that we already have at city hall, and even more critical that we bring the gender balance closer to parity through the coming election.
Why? “Because the decisions that governments make, specifically at the local level, literally affect our everyday lives,” says Kristel vom Scheidt, a Halifax mother of two who is on maternity leave from her job as constituency assistant to provincial MLA Leonard Preyra. “They affect the roads that we drive on, the schools, everything that we interact with — and women’s lives are just different than men’s. Their experience, their perspectives, their views — unless there’s somebody at the table who has had that experience, those voices are not really being represented properly.”
Vom Scheidt knows of which she speaks. Her master’s thesis was on the subject of women in municipal politics in Nova Scotia, and she was co-author of a 2005 report on women in local government that was backed by the Union of Nova Scotia Municipalities, the Nova Scotia Advisory Council on the Status of Women, the Halifax YWCA and Service Nova Scotia.
In fact, those groups, minus the YWCA, have been running municipal campaign schools for women all across the province since April. They did the same back in 2008, with good results: 40 per cent of the participants ran as candidates in the 2008 municipal elections, and of that number, 34 per cent were elected, including one mayor.
Having a greater balance of women in the council chambers, vom Scheidt points out, could go a long way toward combating the disconnect many of us feel with our local government. “The atmosphere of how the council table works and how decisions are made would be different if there were more women at the table,” she says. “It wouldn’t be so petty and immature. ...I think that’s one of the reasons that women are not there, because they look at it and think, ‘That’s not the way that I want to operate.’”
Nomination day is Sept. 1, so there’s still time for candidates to step up. “Most people don’t realize how much of an effect they can have if they get into municipal politics,” says vom Scheidt. “Once you are at the table, you really do have the ability to help set the agenda and sway some of the major issues and priorities of government. You’d be surprised at what a difference you can make.”
Next week: the voice of experience. Francene Cosman, former Halifax County councillor and mayor of the town of Bedford, on what it’s like to be a woman in politics.
Angela Mombourquette is a Halifax writer and editor.
What a bunch of guff.
Submitted by hav2b on July 30, 2012 - 9:35am.
“They affect the roads that we drive on, the schools, everything that we interact with"? Now we all know that's not true. What roads, schools, etc. are so gender biased as to effect men and women differently? Are we supposed to believe this crap?
I'm all for women in politics, but I don't care whether they have equal numbers in council. Governments are supposed to represent the people and either gender can do that. What will you ask for next, an equal number of seats set aside for dog owners, tree huggers, day dreamers, drug smugglers and perverts?
Anyone who can get elected should have a seat, but no seats should be purposely set aside for people with special interests.
ANOTHER SCAM
Submitted by bearpaw on July 30, 2012 - 6:49pm.
Most haven't realized, yet, that our MLA's outsmarted us yet again. We didn't want the boundries changed. They did. This way they protected each others jobs. They got others to set boundries for 51 seats. That insures 51 MLA jobs. Had they determined, how many seats, we wanted, or needed, they probably would have been told 26. That would have put 25 MLA's out of a job. They are a lot smarter than we are. They can now say, a committee set the number, and, in fact, a committee did..
municipal, not provincial
Submitted by Dranya on August 2, 2012 - 4:07pm.
I am confused. You are referencing the provincial boundaries commission, while this story is about the Halifax municipal election.
Do you not realize that these are different elections? Or did you purposely change the subject?
Outrage knows no boundaries
Submitted by Here on August 3, 2012 - 4:19pm.
Naw, you know you're not confused just polite.
Confused people vote to. Politicians count on it.
Gender Matters?
Submitted by Peter Halifax on July 31, 2012 - 11:10pm.
Really - Typicaly Progressive Journalist (must be a prerequisite to be a "news" reporter in NS) - Maybe we should have a guaranteed number of taxpayer funded seats for the blind, disabled, elderly, gay, french, native and transgendered?
All this time I thought we were all equal.
How about, and this is a
Submitted by mapleleaf on August 1, 2012 - 6:59pm.
How about, and this is a crazy idea, we vote for the most qualified?
Nothing is stopping any of
Submitted by Bone Peeler on August 2, 2012 - 3:21am.
Nothing is stopping any of these 3 candidates to run in one of the 16 districts. Trying to sell the district redrawing as a sexist attack is a long shot at best.
I'm all for better representation - but people have to come forth and run. The last thing we need are quotas in politics.
In this particular case it's a shame that they are not running against each other as I fervently hope that 2 of the 3 are not on council this October 21st.
Too many Canadians vote for the popular politicians
Submitted by Here on August 3, 2012 - 4:13pm.
We might be better off if we voted for the people who actually answered questions with thoughtful replies rather than dogma or changing the subject. But I guess that is what elections are about. Flushing out those who believe that ability comes second to special interests.
petty and immature
Submitted by roy rogers on August 3, 2012 - 8:02pm.
von Scheidt is full of it when she claims the council table would not be 'so petty and immature'. No reasons given for her sexist opinion.
Angela, you opened a can of
Submitted by ihave2say... on August 5, 2012 - 9:44am.
Angela, you opened a can of worms. I think that everyone on this council needs to go. There have been too many financial debacles fueled by greed and entitlement in the running of HRM at a time that the average citizen is being gouged for everything from taxes to gas, electric and water bills. This council slept through every one of them. I want a councillor that is intelligent and well versed, abreast of all issues affecting all of HRM, not just a chain rattler who cries foul on the petty issues affecting a small minority in one small section of HRM. I'm glad that the AG is doing a review now before election.
Mapleleaf said it best!
Submitted by Halifax Author on August 8, 2012 - 9:40am.
What a concept! Have the best person for the job in the position regardles of race, creed, sex etc.
What kind of government could we expect from that?