LE PIERRÈS: Blaze of glory for women’s soccer; free kick for Moncton
Could it be this country is passionate about something other than hockey? We Canadians still can’t decide whether to fulminate or to celebrate today.
Our battered soccer squad has scored a bronze — the first team medal in a summer sport since 1936 — which helps move the goalposts in the right direction. But it’s hard to get over the fact we should’ve been going for gold. It’s been four days since the Thriller in Manchester and Canada remains up in arms about football (the real moniker for soccer). Women’s soccer, to boot.
Forget the fact we felled the feisty French, although they outplayed us. The crux of the matter is that we lost unfairly to the Americans after outplaying them, which is the worst thing that could possibly happen. It’ll take the rest of the summer for our collective blood pressure to come down after that one.
The amazing thing is that the average Canadian woman, child and man has become a fan. Again, keep in mind we are not talking about hockey. And yet everybody knows the referee ruined our chances for gold on Monday by making the most anal decision in the annals of the sport. This newspaper even devoted half an acre of sports space to help explain the arcane rule that led to the mother of all officiating controversies.
Then there are the lesser controversies that arose out of the Olympic semi-final, which pundits are dubbing the greatest match in the history of women’s soccer. The American handball that was never called. The Canadian player who stomped — deliberately? — on a rival’s head. The video evidence is on YouTube. You be the judge.
Everybody, it seems, also has an opinion about whether the Canadian women played too rough in denouncing the Norwegian ref in the aftermath of the game. Accusing her of bad judgment is one thing; blatant pro-American bias is quite another.
There is growing consensus about one thing, however — that Canadian captain Christine Sinclair, who scored a hat trick in the heroic effort against the U.S., deserves to be our flag-bearer at the closing ceremonies. She may eventually be suspended by FIFA brass for mouthing off, but it’s her lion-hearted performance on the field of play that speaks loudest for Canada.
What does all this tell me? That women’s soccer has truly arrived as a spectator sport. Unfortunately, it won’t arrive here in Halifax any time soon.
The stage is set for a potential grudge match between Canada and the U.S. in three years, not to mention clashes between titans like Japan, Brazil, France and Great Britain. Canada is hosting the Women’s World Cup in 2015 and the under-20 world championship the previous year.
But there is zero potential for any of this action to take place on Bluenose soil. Something about a sports stadium Halifax won’t get around to building because apparently it’s too rich for our blood. Halifax is the unrivalled regional capital, but it can’t be getting too big for its britches, you see, so Moncton will be your friendly neighbourhood host city.
You have to wonder if and when the cleat will ever be on the other foot. One of the stadium feasibility studies prepared for city council points out that “the HRM population has been growing and is projected to grow by 65,280 persons from 2006 to 2026” and that “a total of almost 700,000 people live within a two-hour drive time of HRM.”
In other words, shouldn’t Monctonians be driving to Halifax? And if Halifax is attracting new residents by the arena-full, why can’t it fill an arena on a semi-regular basis?
Based on population trends alone, I’d say the business case for a multi-purpose stadium grows stronger with each passing year. But the leadership of this province rarely seems to get ahead of the game. This time around, the city failed to convince the province or the feds to cost-share with $20 million apiece, and so another opportunity to adequately equip the city has been punted down the road.
Team Canada learned the hard way that the penalty for delay of game is a free kick to your opponent. As for Halifax, it can never seem to put its ball in play, so guess who’s having yet another field day?
There is no business case
Submitted by asdfvcx on August 10, 2012 - 7:29am.
Stop being silly.
There is no business case for a stadium. If there was a business case, then a business would build it without a massive contribution from taxpayers.
I'd love to watch some of World Cup games here in 2015. But I don't want to spend a huge amount of tax payer dollars to pay for a stadium that will be used a couple of times a year.
Green Bay
Submitted by Selina on August 10, 2012 - 8:03am.
Why not try a true gauge of the demand for a stadium in Halifax. Feature the stadium as a municipal corporation and offer stock in the venture to the general public a la Green Bay, WI. Suitable perks might include preferential seating and event purchasing to shareholders.
A successful subscription would go a long way towards measuring the acceptance of the project and might convince the powers to be of the feasibility of anteing up some aid.
No support? Maybe it'll put the issue to rest and we can all get tickets for Moncton, just not bus tickets.
Subscription? Stock? They have this little thing in Green Bay...
Submitted by shawnino on August 10, 2012 - 8:27am.
...it's called the Green Bay Packers football team.
The Green Bay Packers and some other football teams play in a league called the NFL. For a nine year stretch from 2014 to 2022, American TV networks will pay the NFL $39.6 billion for TV rights. Check out the second paragraph here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NFL_on_television
That's $137 million, per team, per year. (39.6 billion divided by 32 teams divided by 9 years.)
Now NFL payrolls are big: this year's salary cap for player talent is $120.6 million. There's coaches, staff stadium upkeep, travel, etc. But that $137 million is before the team sells a single ticket, jersey, bratwurst or plastic cheesehead. Imagine operating a business where your biggest expense, labour, is more than covered off long before you open the doors to customers.
The Packers survive in Green Bay only because of the NFL's TV deal. The dinky $250 share purchase plan is just a drop in the bucket.
Good idea !
Submitted by beejay on August 10, 2012 - 8:33am.
Selina, I like your idea, as it would be an excellent gauge as to the interest of the area to support a stadium. As for Mr Le Pierres's remarks, it is interesting how he is using the hype of the women's soccer at the Olympics to push for a stadium. The big question is, how long will it last.
Does LePierres think Canada will be playing in Moncton?
Submitted by shawnino on August 10, 2012 - 8:53am.
The host team draws in this tournament . The other teams won't draw flies. Look at the attendance figures at the olympic tournament just wrapping up in the UK:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Football_at_the_2012_Summer_Olympics_–_Women's_tournament
The doubleheaders in Group E (Team GB) were exceptionally well attended. That'll be Canada in 2015, and they'll put those games in huge stadia. Commonwealth. Skydome. And so on.
Group F and Group G typically drew 11,000-18,000 for doubleheaders. LOCOG gave away 500,000 soccer tickets. Assuming half those tickets were to the men's tournament, LOCOG was still giving away more than 10,000 tickets per girls doubleheader on total attendance of 18,000. Which means at most, there were 8,000 paying fans, and often less.
...And we need a 20,000 seat stadium for a two week event where we'd likely get two or three days of action with fewer than 8,000 paying fans? Get outta here. Canada will be playing in Edmonton in front of 50,000 people. Moncton will be getting North Korea vs. Burundi and will be lucky to actually sell 3,000 tickets. I may show up just to use my "Kim Jung-Un Thinks I'm at Work" sign again, but I would imagine my ticket will be comped just to avoid the embarrassment of empty seats.
Let's build a stadium within 2 hours drive of Halifax
Submitted by Here on August 10, 2012 - 10:03am.
Funny that playing the game of their lives resulted in defeat and cries of fix. Then when they are totally dominated by France and fluke one out it is a great victory. Depends on where you are standing I suppose.
In Halifax there is minimal public support for a stadium, mainly contractors, event promoters, soccer NS, and politicians. The business community could care less. Everyone wants the Halifax ratepayer to fork out 135 million and build them a stadium that could be used between tourneys by local clubs who couldn't afford the fees to mow the turf.
Yet soccer NS is huge. So let's compromise and build the thing in Truro, the hub of Nova Scotia. Truro is less than 80 minutes from Moncton and 60 from Halifax. The spinoffs to the local economy would be fantastic for the economy in that area and the whole thing could be paid for by a special area rate, say $300 a year per ratepayer within a 30 minute drive for the next 60 years.
Thought not.
Stadium?
Submitted by JollyJack on August 10, 2012 - 10:50am.
Lets look at some comparisons. 700,000 live within a 2 hour drive of HRM. How many live within a 2 hour drive of Vancouver, Toronto, Montreal, Hamilton, Calgary or Winnipeg? 700,000 is a tiny amount of the population required to support a decent size stadium, which would be expected to seat 10% of the total population within a 2 hour drive of Halifax to make it anywhwere near worthwhile. Look at QMJ Hockey, the Mooseheads are the local sports stars, but the Metro Centre, which can seat 10,000, is nowhere near full on game nights. It approaches capacity during the playoffs, a couple of times a year. How does this columnist expect to make a 70,000 seat stadium profitable?
If there's money in it, let business interests build and operate the proposed stadium. If there's money in it, they will jump at the opportunity to make money, greed ensures that....but I don't see any businessmen falling over themselves, clamouring for the chance to build a stadium.